Preview

Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists

Advanced search

Metasubjectivity – Relevance and Prospects

Abstract

Today, the implementation of the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standards (FSES) in teaching schoolchildren is becoming especially relevant for educational organizations. The Federal State Educational Standards, setting the requirements for the results of mastering the main educational program by students, pay special attention to meta-subject learning outcomes, including inter-subject concepts and universal educational actions (regulatory, cognitive, communicative) mastered by students. In this regard, the author first examines in detail the phenomenon of "meta-subjectivity" in educational activities, didactic concepts accompanying it, offers his own understanding of this issue, then introduces approaches to its definition and productive forms of implementing the meta-subject approach in the activities of educational organizations. The article analyzes the concept of metasubjectivity and its components. The importance of meta-subjects in modern education in combination with the Federal State Educational Standard. The meta-subject approach in education and, accordingly, meta-subject educational technologies were developed precisely in order to solve the problem of disunity, splitting, isolation from each other of different scientific disciplines and, as a result, academic subjects.

About the Author

F. F. Shaikhutdinova
Kazan (Privolzhsky) Federal University
Russian Federation

Fluza F. Shaykhutdinova – music and art teacher

Kazan



References

1. Asmolov A. G. How to design universal educational activities in primary chool. From action to thought. – 2011.

2. Babansky Yu.K. Optimization of the educational process. - M.: Enlightenment, 1982.

3. Galyan S.V. Metasubject approach in teaching schoolchildren. Methodological recommendations for teachers of secondary schools. - Surgut: RIO Surgut, 2014.

4. Gromyko Yu.V. "Metapredmet "Sign". M., 2001. 285 p.

5. Kondakov A.M. The concept of federal state educational standards of general education. – 2009.

6. Kolesina K.Yu. Metaproject training: theory and technologies of implementation in the educational process: Abstract. diss. ... Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences: 13.00.01. Rostov-on-Don: SFU, 2009. 35 p.

7. Kovaleva G.S., Krasnovsky E.A., Krasnianskaya K.A., Loginova O.B., Tatur O.A. Model of the evaluation system of the results of the development of general education programs. [electronic resource]. Access mode: /www.standart.edu.ru/ (date of request: 12.11.2022)

8. Kuznetsov A.A. About school standards of the second generation / A.A. Kuznetsov. // Municipal education: innovations and experiment, 2008. No. 2. p. 3-

9. Fedorova S.S. Technology of assigning meta-names /http://festival.1september.ru/articles/100689/ (accessed: 11/13/2022).

10. Fomenko I.A. Creation of a system for the formation of a new content of education based on the principles of meta-subject. [electronic resource]. Access mode: fomenko.edusite.ru/p35aa1.html/ (date of request: 12.11.2022).

11. Khutorskoy A.V. Heuristic type of education: results of scientific and practical research // Pedagogy, 1999. No. 7. pp. 15-22.


Review

For citations:


Shaikhutdinova F.F. Metasubjectivity – Relevance and Prospects. Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists. 2022;6(5):35-44. (In Russ.)

Views: 49


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-9669 (Print)